|
|
Post by kentuckybrown on Aug 8, 2012 17:44:17 GMT -6
Quick question, how do the six players from the teams selected.
|
|
|
|
Post by hiller 87 on Aug 8, 2012 18:11:08 GMT -6
I'd say you can choose your own 6 players from anyone of your 20 man roster
|
|
|
|
Post by ihateboomis on Aug 8, 2012 21:48:58 GMT -6
I like the 6v6 idea. I saw the post on facebook and decided to check it out. God I would've loved that rule when I played. I was a completely different player with less than 8 on the court. P.S anyone want to make an Oakland University team? I am going there for my masters in the fall. I don't have time to set everything up though.
|
|
|
|
Post by 2tired2dodge on Aug 9, 2012 10:27:22 GMT -6
Can we just start a poll thread? I vote
-6v6, 10sec Shot clock, 10 minute clock. 7 balls - 0-2-3-2-0
If the clock runs out, the team with most players left wins.
|
|
|
|
Post by liltorr13 on Aug 9, 2012 14:28:20 GMT -6
I agree with the 6vs6, 10 sec shot clock, and 10 minute clock, 7 balls, and 0-2-3-2-0 just because I feel another opening rush should be done.
|
|
mtrip8
Junior Member
Posts: 62
|
Post by mtrip8 on Aug 10, 2012 23:48:49 GMT -6
I agree with sam and think it shouldnt be timed the way to win should be to eliminate the other team. with the 10 second shot clock it shouldnt take that long to finish the game
|
|
|
|
Post by Phelps 2 on Aug 11, 2012 15:38:52 GMT -6
This all sounds like a great idea. But in order to keep the rules of the whole game similar I think we should do 5v5 with a 10 sec shot clock and 10 min clock and use 7 balls 0-2-3-2-0
|
|
mtrip8
Junior Member
Posts: 62
|
Post by mtrip8 on Aug 11, 2012 16:36:54 GMT -6
I just want to know why we need a 10 min clock. If im not mistaken the point is to find a clear winner, as soon as you add a clock as soon a the first team gets a player from another team out then they just sit back the rest of the time and make worthless throws just to clear the shot clock.
No time limit will actually get a true winner because the teams dont have the option to sit back
|
|
|
|
Post by hiller 87 on Aug 11, 2012 17:09:53 GMT -6
I'm with Mark here, you put a ten minute clock in and it's basically the same thing as the old rule just with a 9 less players and a 10 clock the whole time.
A 6v6 point shouldn't take more than 10 minutes anyways, but if you put a clock on it then people will milk it. The reason this needs to be changed is for fairness and excitement, and putting a clock on it adds neither to the game.
|
|
|
|
Post by Phelps 2 on Aug 11, 2012 17:16:02 GMT -6
I see what you guys are saying and now that I think about it I agree. Having a time limit is just going to make people want to waste time instead of making things happen and speeding up the game play.
|
|
|
|
Post by Zigmister on Aug 12, 2012 19:46:21 GMT -6
|
|
|
|
Post by WKU-Perrone-76 on Aug 13, 2012 1:45:24 GMT -6
I agree.
No clock, 6vs6, 7 balls, 0-2-3-2-0, 10 sec shot clock, fight to the death.
|
|
|
|
Post by heroofvcu on Aug 13, 2012 8:19:28 GMT -6
I agree. No clock, 6vs6, 7 balls, 0-2-3-2-0, 10 sec shot clock, fight to the death. I vote yes for this as well |
|
|
|
Post by peters27 on Aug 13, 2012 8:49:52 GMT -6
Are people vetoing the quorum call or are they simply not responding as of yet? I mean, as far as I'm concerned, this is just about as big of an issue as the opening rush was last year. The current overtime rules (IMO) are an absolute joke as they stand now.  |
|
|
|
Post by hiller 87 on Aug 13, 2012 10:03:19 GMT -6
I agree Wes. There's no harm in allowing the quorum to happen, at least then we get some discussion and stuff. And I can't imagine anybody loves the OT rules enough to not wanna change it. So if you're reading this, please tell your captain or president to agree to at least discuss changing the rules
|
|
